RSS Feed   
  • Latest News:

    Another world is possible
  • Category: Events

    The Harvard Library Occupation

    The New Harvard Library Working Group led an autonomous action on Sunday Feb. 12, occupying Lamont Library during the last hour of the Students Occupy Summit. The New Library Occupation then connected with the Student Summit via livestream, to the enthusiastic support of the Summit participants, who marched to the library and chanted outside its windows.

    For the next few days, the Occupation held Think Tanks that attracted students, library employees, and university officials. Think Tank discussions ranged from “What is a library?” and “Power and the University” to “Strategies for the Occupy [Harvard] Movement.” All were recorded and are available on Occupy Harvard’s website. Numerous actions were brainstormed in those discussions, including an initiative to document and archive library workers’ experience in the library. One of the think tanks was attended by a member of the Harvard Library Innovation Laboratory (an independent project of the Law Library) — he suggested a collaboration between students, library employees and the Innovation Lab to envision a restructuring of the library system that draws on the experience of employees and library users, instead of on (three!) outside consulting agencies.

    A Think Tank of students and workers at the Library

    The Occupation’s program also included skill shares and knowledge shares, a teach-in on challenging institutional hegemony, and a nonviolence training workshop. At night, Occupiers watched silent films, welcoming late-night library patrons to stop by and share food and films. The occasional Absurd Theater Workshop with university police was also a special treat. The Occupation was watched by as many as four city policemen and university guards at any given time,prompting some nonviolent resistance against spontaneous rules on sleeping “equipment.”

    The Occupy Harvard Pink Bloc

    While they occupied, students at times struggled to keep up with their demanding workload. Similarly, supportive university employees were concerned that they might jeopardize their position by visibly participating in the Occupy. Although the police presence was oppressive, many at the libraries recalled successful protests in Harvard’s history. In 1929, Corliss Lamont (who endowed the occupied library in his name) interfered on behalf of 19 scrubwomen who were fired by the Harvard Administration for demanding to be paid the Massachusetts Minimum Wage. On March 6, 1971 the International Women’s Day marchers occupied a building on the Harvard campus to turn it into the Harvard Women’s Center. Others also recall the Living Wage Campaign in Harvard’s recent history, as well as the numerous successful actions of the Student Labor Action Movement of Harvard.
    This Valentine’s Day, to thank the Occupiers for their support, members of the Clerical Workers’ Union and non-unionzed employees presented them with a Valentine’s Day card.

    Library employees present Occupy Harvard protesters a Valentine's Day card

    On Thursday, workers, students, and alumni rallied to protest the university’s top-down, secretive approach to the restructuring of the library. Cambridge City Councillor Leland Cheung spoke at the rally, letting the protesters know that the City of Cambridge stood with them. Protesters decried Harvard’s plan to indiscriminately buy out long-time, older workers, calling against layoffs in Harvard’s libraries.

    Rally against indiscriminate layoffs and lack of transparency at Harvard

    This targeted occupation ends tonight, Friday, at 10pm. Before it leaves the library, Occupy Harvard is holding a phone-in to contact university donors and inform them about how their funds are being used by the Administration. The Occupy is also offering two Think Tanks, a nonviolence training, and a Library Assembly. Future actions are in the planning stages. To learn about what comes next, follow Occupy Harvard on their social media channels and see www.occupyharvard.net.

    Panel at Suffolk University discusses Occupy Boston’s Legal Significance

    Bill Sinnott, Marty Baron, Noah McKenna, Carol Rose and Howard Cooper /Photo by Matthew J Shochat

    On February 13th, 2012, at 6pm, inside Classroom 315 at Suffolk University, many law students, Occupy Boston supporters and curious individuals gathered to hear a panel titled “Occupy Boston: The Rise of the Tent City and Its First Amendment Implications,” regarding the legal significance and precedence behind the Occupy Boston encampment and evictions faced throughout it’s existence. Opening remarks covering the history of the Occupy Boston encampment were presented by Carol Rose, Executive Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts, while the Moderator was Marty Baron, Editor of The Boston Globe. The panelists were Bill Sinnott, Corporation Counsel of the City of Boston, Noah McKenna, a member of Occupy Boston and named plaintiff, and finally Howard Cooper, Lead Counsel for Occupy Boston plaintiffs, founding partner, Todd & Weld LLP. This particular event was co-sponsored by the ACLU of Massachusetts and Boston Lawyer Chapter of the American Constitution Society.

    Noah speaking on the panel /Photo by Matthew J Shochat

    The first in the panel to speak was activist Noah McKenna regarding why exactly he joined Occupy Boston and following such, Bill Sinnott, explained the thoughts and opinions of Mayor Menino and his Administration, including elements taking part during the nights of October 11th and December 10th that resulted in arrests of a total of 179 protesters. Howard Cooper than spoke on what legal basis by which he was defending Occupy Boston in court in favor of their rights. Further into the discussion, the health and safety of the protesters and what they did to meet the requirements of the health and safety officials, which was frequently stonewalled by police during the time of the encampment.

    At some point, a participant asked a question relating to the decision Citzens United vs. Federal Election Commission (2010), which paved the way for the creation of independent expenditure political action committees (or PACs), which overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and partially McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003), by allowing corporations to fund politicians as a method of “speaking” whereas the protesters who had in court tried to uphold that their actions were fundamentally First Amendments Rights protected by the Constitution.

    Another participant also referenced the recent Montana Supreme Court rejection of the decision on Citizens United vs. FEC, which occurred on Dec 30, 2011, which argues that the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Citizens United vs. FEC did not apply to Montana’s century-old ban on direct corporate election spending, due to the state presenting extensive evidence of actual corruption, something of which the U.S. Supreme Court found lacking in Citizens United.

    Due to a class needing the room immediately following the Panel, at 9pm, the crowd quickly dispersed.

    Here is a clip from the panel.

    No Layoffs Campaign – Picket at Harvard!

    TOMORROW (Thursday 2/16) 5:30pm
    Lamont Library, 11 Quincy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138

    Library workers present Occupy Harvard a Valentine's Day card
    Library workers present Occupy Harvard a Valentine’s Day card
    The No Layoffs Campaign will picket outside of Lamont Library, the undergraduate library where Occupy Harvard has set up its temporary, targeted occupation, to call attention to the University’s draconian policies.
    Harvard’s libraries are still reeling from the staff cuts of 2008. That the library “restructuring” involves buyouts & layoffs has come as a shock to many who say that their departments are already incredibly understaffed.
    The Harvard administration has announced a plan to restructure the library system that will make libraries “more efficient” which will include a “smaller workforce.” The jobs of hundreds of staff currently employed by the libraries are threatened; measures include cuts and restructuring by “voluntary and involuntary means.” High unemployment rates make finding a new job nearly impossible, especially for older workers, who are being incentivized to leave “or else.” Harvard’s endowment grew 21% last year, to $32 billion, and the library operating costs represent only 3.3% of the annual budget.
    Support the union of clerical workers and nonunionized Harvard employees, including our research librarians!

    Rally to Save the T! in Pictures

    Photo by Matthew J Shochat

    At 4 pm, about 200 protesters, including those from Occupy Boston, Occupy UMass Boston, MassUniting, Veterans For Peace and ACLU, among others, gathered in front of the Dartmouth Entrance of the Boston Public Library prior to one of the city’s MBTA city hearings on the proposed fare hikes.

     

    Photo by Matthew J Shochat

    A teacher from Roxbury Community College speaking at the rally.

    Photo by Matthew J Shochat

    Protesters holding a sign that suggests cutting military spending and fund public transportation at the demonstration.

    Photo by Matthew J Shochat

    The protest lasted until the the Hearing located inside the library, at 6 pm.

    Harvard is Re-Occupied!

    Occupy Harvard's occupation of Lamont LibraryThe following communiqué comes from our sisters and brothers at Occupy Harvard. Today they began a one-week, 24-hour occupation of Lamont Café—part of Harvard University’s Lamont Library, which is located in Harvard Yard. You can read the original post here. For more information, check out Occupy Harvard’s press release. Finally, you can support Occupy Harvard by making a donation. Solidarity!

    Harvard’s Lamont Library is Occupied

    Dear Friends and Community Members,

    Lamont Café is occupied.

    We intend for it to remain occupied until Friday at 10 pm.

    At a time when Harvard University is restructuring the library, we are working to change what a library is understood to be. Take a break. Think. The New Harvard Library Working Group of Occupy Harvard has opened a persistent community space for critical thought, engaged learning, and insistent action in the Lamont Library Café.

    We invite you to join us as we engage in communal tasks of producing knowledge (skill-shares, tutoring, and, yes, we will read your paper drafts), meet for morning coffee and conversation, and host twice-daily “Think Tanks”—topical discussions in which participants enter as equals and where professors, students, and workers converse as peers. Our current schedule is included below, but check-in frequently as new events and opportunities will be taking shape as the days progress.

    Why now? Why Lamont? The Harvard Library transition is a simulacrum of the University’s accession to neoliberal imperatives. Occupy, whether at Harvard or Wall Street, challenges and refuses the devastating willingness of our broken society to view humans as expendable resources and systems as ultimately beholden to profit. A library needs the workers who are its lifeblood, just as a functioning democratic society needs the voices of the 99%. The proposed library transition not only fails to address these systemic problems, it replicates them—both in terms of business practice and the production of scholarship and knowledge.

    As members of the Harvard community, we are committed to occupying the spaces of our education with integrity and intentionality. Lamont Library Café is an educational space specifically vested to facilitate the learning ideals of the University. We are doing no more and no less than striving to fulfill the promise of this space.

    Thank you for your engagement, your solidarity, and your support as we live into the possibilities of a new Harvard Library together.

    Take a break. Think.

    New Harvard Library Working Group
    Occupy Harvard

    For the schedule of events at occupied Lamont Library, click here.

    Contact us

    Occupy Boston Media <Media@occupyboston.org> • <Info@occupyboston.org> • @Occupy_Boston